Friday, October 3, 2008

Nobel Laureates for Barack Obama

[via Science Blogs] Suck it up Joe Six Pack, but 61 Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine have endorsed Senator Barack Obama for President of the United States. The signatories include the most famous names in science, so call me names, but I'm definitely with these elitists:

Alexei Abrikosov Physics 2003
Roger Guillemin Medicine 1977
Peter Agre Chemistry 2003
John L. Hall Physics 2005
Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989
Leland H. Hartwell Medicine 2001
Philip W. Anderson Physics 1977
Dudley Herschbach Chemistry 1986
Richard Axel Medicine 2004
Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981
David Baltimore Medicine 1975 H.
Robert Horvitz Medicine 2002
Baruj Benacerraf Medicine 1980
Louis Ignarro Medicine 1998
Paul Berg Chemistry 1980
Eric R. Kandel Medicine 2000
J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989
Walter Kohn Chemistry 1998
N. Bloembergen Physics 1981
Roger Kornberg Chemistry 2006
Michael S. Brown Medicine 1985
Leon M. Lederman Physics 1988
Linda B. Buck Medicine 2004
Craig C. Mello Medicine 2006
Mario R. Capecchi Medicine 2007
Marshall Nirenberg Medicine 1968
Stanley Cohen Medicine 1986
Douglas D. Osheroff Physics 1996
Leon Cooper Physics 1972
Stanley B. Prusiner Medicine 1997
James W. Cronin Physics 1980
Norman F. Ramsey Physics 1989
Robert F. Curl Chemistry 1996
Robert Richardson Physics 1996
Johann Diesenhofer Chemistry 1988
Burton Richter Physics 1976
John B. Fenn Chemistry 2002
Sherwood Rowland Chemistry 1995
Edmond H. Fischer Medicine 1992
Oliver Smithies Medicine 2007
Val Fitch Physics 1980
Richard R Schrock Chemistry 2005
Jerome I. Friedman Physics 1990
Joseph H. Taylor Jr. Physics 1993
Riccardo Giacconi Physics 2002
E. Donnall Thomas Medicine 1990
Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980
Charles H. Townes Physics 1964
Alfred G. Gilman Medicine 1994
Daniel C.Tsui Physics 1998
Donald A. Glaser Physics 1960
Harold Varmus Medicine 1989
Sheldon L. Glashow Physics 1979
James D. Watson Medicine 1962
Joseph Goldstein Medicine 1985
Eric Wieschaus Medicine 1995
Paul Greengard Medicine 2000
Frank Wilczek Physics 2004
David Gross Physics 2004
Robert W. Wilson Physics 1978
Robert H. Grubbs Chemistry 2005

An Open Letter to the American People

This year's presidential election is among the most significant in our nation's history. The country urgently needs a visionary leader who can ensure the future of our traditional strengths in science and technology and who can harness those strengths to address many of our greatest problems: energy, disease, climate change, security, and economic competitiveness.

We are convinced that Senator Barack Obama is such a leader, and we urge you to join us in supporting him.

During the administration of George W. Bush, vital parts of our country's scientific enterprise have been damaged by stagnant or declining federal support. The government's scientific advisory process has been distorted by political considerations. As a result, our once dominant position in the scientific world has been shaken and our prosperity has been placed at risk. We have lost time critical for the development of new ways to provide energy, treat disease, reverse climate change, strengthen our security, and improve our economy.

We have watched Senator Obama's approach to these issues with admiration. We especially applaud his emphasis during the campaign on the power of science and technology to enhance our nation's competitiveness. In particular, we support the measures he plans to take - through new initiatives in education and training, expanded research funding, an unbiased process for obtaining scientific advice, and an appropriate balance of basic and applied research - to meet the nation's and the world's most urgent needs.

Senator Obama understands that Presidential leadership and federal investments in science and technology are crucial elements in successful governance of the world's leading country. We hope you will join us as we work together to ensure his election in November.


Jego said...

They sort of lost me at climate change. :-D

john marzan said...

"Senator Biden seems to have accomplished the role of criticizing John McCain with poise and aplomb far better than Governor Palin."

but that wasn't supposed to be palin's job--criticizing mccain.

critizing obama, palin did a poor job, because she lacks knowledge of those core issues.

Anonymous said...

Both were not exactly good. The moderator was LOUSY.

Palin was worst than Biden. However, Palin was slightly better than herself compared to the disastrous TV interviews she had. The thing that was clearly seen was that she was not answering the questions. She would try to relate the question to a memorized spiel that she knew well and she would regurgitate that.

You can see it in her if she is excited to spew out what she had memorized. You can also see the fear when she did not know much of the issue. Her worst moment was in the climate change thing, she totally talked nonsense just like the TV interviews.

McCain needed her to shine tonight but she failed. However, it could have been worst. She could have torpedoed the whole campaign but she did not. She just made them lose some more points.

The Nashman said...

a lot of them immigrants/2nd generation immigrants too.

and yet. pinoy immigrants vote republican? but why?

Anonymous said...

they support Obama? not so Nobel-worthy as far as seeing through the Obama fairy dust is concerned.

Go, John.

spadamchrist said...

The McCain campaign knows they don't have good answers on the issues that matter to ordinary Americans. And they've flatly stated that if they talk about the economy, they will lose.Instead, they keep coming up with new, outrageous attacks that are even more offensive and baseless than the ones before.