tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14974164.post6812036968508974572..comments2023-10-20T21:46:49.945+08:00Comments on Philippine Commentary: The Heliocentric Theory of Global WarmingDeany Bocobohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01443168826029321831noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14974164.post-38281652199346219602009-10-13T10:18:43.751+08:002009-10-13T10:18:43.751+08:00"Global Warming" is a political, not sci..."Global Warming" is a political, not scientific, phenomenon. That is clear since the Global Warmists insist that the standard of proof is that they must be proved wrong...not that they must prove their hypothesis correct. <br /><br />Also note that they insist on using the standard lefty trick of "moving the goal posts". They now keep trying to shift the name of there pet thesis to "Climate Change" rather than "Global Warming"...since the latter name is proving very inconvenient indeed. <br /><br />There have been so many anomalies in their data and models, that have recently come to light, in the way data has been collected, filtered and reported that they now bear an even greater burden...they must now show that the scientific data supports their thesis AND that they are not political hacks trying to pervert science to their own ends. <br /><br />"The debate is over!" is not a valid scientific response...though a perfectly valid and predictable political response. Just ask Al Gore:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf-fzVH6v_U&feature=player_embeddedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14974164.post-71450857790191082642009-10-12T22:44:18.314+08:002009-10-12T22:44:18.314+08:00To test it, they should look at Mars and Venus. Th...To test it, they should look at Mars and Venus. The Copernican theory of global warming however may only hold for the rocky planets.Ben Vallejohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02963290696331676531noreply@blogger.com